Today’s Focus

President Donald Trump told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to retaliate against Iran following an overnight missile exchange, according to reporting by Axios and Reuters that was confirmed by The Guardian’s live coverage on June 7.

The directive came hours after Iran launched missile salvos at Israel and Israel struck Iranian military targets in several cities. The Guardian reported that Trump told reporters Netanyahu would have to accept a U.S.-brokered framework with Tehran because, in the president’s words, “I call the shots.”

Iran’s joint military command announced it was halting attacks after Trump publicly told both sides to “stop shooting” and instructed Tehran to “get back to the table,” according to Reuters. The Independent reported that Iran had earlier vowed a “crushing response” to Israeli strikes near Beirut, which Israel said were aimed at Hezbollah positions.

The fighting drew in multiple fronts. The IDF said a missile was also launched at Israel from Yemen, and the U.S. military said it destroyed two drones over the Strait of Hormuz, according to The Guardian’s timeline. PBS NewsHour reported the exchange marked the first major bombardment since a fragile ceasefire took effect in early April.

An Iranian envoy told reporters the Strait of Hormuz would reopen to shipping with a new transit fee, The Guardian reported, after Tehran briefly suspended flights at its international airport. Oil prices jumped on the news of the strikes before easing as Iran signaled a stand-down.

Trump said he would not unfreeze Iranian assets before a peace deal is completed, according to The Guardian. Pope Leo called the renewed combat a “painful defeat” of negotiations, CNN reported.

The Debate

Supporters argue

Backers of Trump’s intervention say the president used U.S. leverage to halt an escalation that was on the verge of pulling Washington into a wider war. They point to Iran’s announced halt within hours of his public statement as evidence the pressure worked, citing Reuters’ reporting that Tehran’s joint command stood down after Trump’s “stop shooting” message.

Allies in Congress argued the move is consistent with Trump’s stated doctrine of using American weight to force negotiations rather than open-ended military commitments. Axios reported the White House framed the call to Netanyahu as a demand to preserve a U.S.-Iran diplomatic track that Trump considers near completion.

Supporters also note the practical results so far: Iran says it will reopen the Strait of Hormuz to commercial traffic, according to The Guardian, and oil markets pulled back from intraday highs reported by BBC. They argue that without Trump’s direct order to Netanyahu, a third Iranian barrage and a deeper Israeli campaign were likely within 24 hours.

Critics argue

Critics contend Trump publicly overrode a close ally in the middle of a live conflict, weakening Israel’s deterrence against further attacks. They highlight his “I call the shots” remark, reported by The Guardian, as evidence the United States is dictating terms to Jerusalem rather than coordinating with it.

Some Israeli commentators quoted in The Guardian’s live blog said halting retaliation rewards Iran for striking first and leaves Hezbollah’s command structure in Beirut’s southern suburbs largely intact. The Independent reported Iranian officials threatened U.S. bases earlier in the day, which critics say should have hardened, not softened, the American posture.

Opponents also question the durability of any pause. PBS NewsHour noted the April ceasefire collapsed within weeks, and CNN cited Pope Leo’s warning that negotiations have already failed once. Critics argue a verbal stand-down without a written framework gives Tehran time to rearm proxies in Lebanon and Yemen.

What the experts say

Nonpartisan analysts say the immediate de-escalation is real but fragile. The International Crisis Group, in commentary cited by Reuters, has noted that Iran-Israel exchanges since 2024 have repeatedly paused after U.S. intervention only to resume within weeks once domestic political pressure builds on both sides.

Suzanne Maloney, director of foreign policy at the Brookings Institution, has written that Tehran’s calculus depends heavily on whether sanctions relief is on the table, a point relevant to Trump’s refusal to unfreeze Iranian assets before a deal, as reported by The Guardian. Without economic incentives, halts tend to be tactical rather than strategic.

On the energy side, the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates roughly 20% of global petroleum liquids transit the Strait of Hormuz, which is why even brief disruptions move oil prices sharply, as BBC reported on June 7. The Council on Foreign Relations has documented that Hezbollah retains thousands of rockets in Lebanon, meaning any Iran-Israel pause does not automatically quiet the northern front.

By the Numbers

2: people killed in the Israeli strike on Beirut’s southern suburbs that preceded the Iranian barrage, according to The Guardian.

20%: approximate share of global petroleum liquids that pass through the Strait of Hormuz, per the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

2: drones the U.S. military said it destroyed over the Strait of Hormuz on June 7, according to The Guardian.

5: conditions for a “just and lasting peace” set out by Volodymyr Zelensky and E3 leaders at separate London talks, per The Kyiv Independent, illustrating the parallel diplomatic load on Washington.

April 2026: when the previous Iran-Israel ceasefire took effect before collapsing, according to PBS NewsHour.

1 million: approximate crowd at Pope Leo’s Madrid Mass where he called the renewed war a “painful defeat” of negotiations, per CNN and BBC.

Sources

Get the briefing in your inbox every morning.

Subscribe